Add 'Banks' £30bn In Compensation Claims And Fines 'Pose Threat To Stability''

3 days ago · 41a5b7692c
1 changed files with 1 additions and 0 deletions
--- a/Banks%27-%C2%A330bn-In-Compensation-Claims-And-Fines-%27Pose-Threat-To-Stability%27.md
+++ b/Banks%27-%C2%A330bn-In-Compensation-Claims-And-Fines-%27Pose-Threat-To-Stability%27.md
@ -0,0 +1 @@
+<br>Most don't recognise, as we do, the differing roles of solicitors and barristers/advocates. Barristers and [solicitors realise](https://ukmill.co.uk/employer/blogoscience/) that, as Benjamin Franklin said, they need to either hang collectively, or they may assuredly dangle separately.<br><br>A system which recognises the sensible challenges of regulation whilst encouraging innovation in threat administration and customer support would align regulation with innovation and development.<br><br>[lawsociety.org.uk](https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/career-advice/becoming-a-solicitor/qualifying-with-a-degree/the-legal-practice-course)That the attack by two gunmen on a Muhammed cartoon drawing contest in Dallas was an outrage would not retroactively justify that stupid, gratuitous, Hebdo-like provocation masquerading as "free speech." Once more, the purpose is not that the competition should have been barred legally
			`@ -0,0 +1 @@`
			<br>Most don't recognise, as we do, the differing roles of solicitors and barristers/advocates. Barristers and [solicitors realise](https://ukmill.co.uk/employer/blogoscience/) that, as Benjamin Franklin said, they need to either hang collectively, or they may assuredly dangle separately.<br><br>A system which recognises the sensible challenges of regulation whilst encouraging innovation in threat administration and customer support would align regulation with innovation and development.<br><br>[lawsociety.org.uk](https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/career-advice/becoming-a-solicitor/qualifying-with-a-degree/the-legal-practice-course)That the attack by two gunmen on a Muhammed cartoon drawing contest in Dallas was an outrage would not retroactively justify that stupid, gratuitous, Hebdo-like provocation masquerading as "free speech." Once more, the purpose is not that the competition should have been barred legally