From fa3117395f2595009611c8eb6429801f515966d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Angelina Rivera <tomokosabrina@andindoc.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 14:35:23 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add 'GM Plaintiffs Add Racketeering Declare To Recall
 Lawsuits'

---
 ...aintiffs-Add-Racketeering-Declare-To-Recall-Lawsuits.md | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 GM-Plaintiffs-Add-Racketeering-Declare-To-Recall-Lawsuits.md

diff --git a/GM-Plaintiffs-Add-Racketeering-Declare-To-Recall-Lawsuits.md b/GM-Plaintiffs-Add-Racketeering-Declare-To-Recall-Lawsuits.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0072eb3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/GM-Plaintiffs-Add-Racketeering-Declare-To-Recall-Lawsuits.md
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+Underneath the regulations, solely the individual who bought the original copy of the work is legally allowed to repeat it, not others, equivalent to associates or family.
+
+Mitting J said the Legislation Society encouraged the general public to rely on its data as to who was a solicitor, and if members of the public relied on an imposter", trusting him with money and shedding it, they would be shocked to find that they had no remedy.
+
+In line with the Lawtel report, the bogus solicitor had procured his place on Discover a Solicitor fraudulently.
+
+You will get hold of a illustration order if the courtroom decides that it's within the 'interest of justice' that you've got a solicitor
\ No newline at end of file